Link to post: https://user.xmission.com/~drudy/mtman/html/crooks.html
This is a letter by a Ramsey Crooks from
New York of 1856. The letter alludes to the integrity of a Col. John Fremont
who Crooks sees as a potential President of the then confederacy. He first
begins by a short doubt of his potential by from an article in the Detroit
advertiser but quickly changes the mood to commend Fremont on his masculinity.
He clearly views the role of President to be an ideal of stereotypical
masculinity as he comments on the brawn and bravery of him discovering the
American mountain land where he is “surrounded by savages and grizzly bears”; a quality that he says is
rare in the US but he seems to believe shows good promise for future leadership
skills. He seems to to and fro between his positives and negatives which is
formally worded but informally structured. It’s almost as if he’s trying to
play devil’s advocate with himself here and is just venting his opinions to a
respected friend.
He
goes on to not only disavow Fremont but also his endorsers by saying that
others that had gone before him, the hunters and traders who many of which had
gone through the South Pass long before the colonel. It was therefore not only
an untrue claim of ‘discovery’ but also a meaningless one as an attention
seeker for political and social status benefit, as he mentions that his party
“must be pressed very hard when they had to drag in a circumstance so very
unimportant as who discovered the 'South Pass.'”
It is
after this point in the letter that Crooks gives a much clearer and decisive
verdict on his feelings towards the Col. Fremont. He then enters a brief
history lesson to back up his point regarding the true discovery of the South
Pass. This is interesting considering the time as this information is
surprisingly detailed given the time period. Archives of these kind of
discoveries would largely be harder to come across than in today’s world. This
does open up the possibility for Crooks to be stretching the truth, but given
the detail of the various events spanning from 1810 to 1814, and given Crooks’
Esquire title assumes Crooks is more likely to be an intellectual pioneer.
No comments:
Post a Comment