Monday, 13 February 2017

Sierra Nevada

This image is a painting by Albert Bierstadt called Sierra Nevada. The image was painted somewhere between 1871 and 1873 and shows the unspoiled Sierra Nevada mountains in California.







The Painting is symbolic of the area and captures the sublime nature of the area beautifully. There is a huge contrast contrast between the grey and dangerous looking mountains in the upper half of the painting and the peaceful meadows and lake at the bottom which helps the person viewing the painting imagine the sheer vastness of the landscape portrayed. The unspoiled nature of the painting is captured by the small family of deer in the bottom half of the picture. Another element of the painting is that the mountains reach all the way up into the sky which could be symbolic of the heavens.


As Bierstadt, himself was born in Solingen in Germany and was himself an immigrant, he would most probably have never seen scenes as vast as he did in America. This awe is conveyed through his paintings of the western landscapes.


This is the website of the Sioux tribe. Their website has details on it about how to contact members of their government and lots of information on the History of the tribe. Although there is a tab for culture on the website, there is not much information under it. There are some links to museum websites but these seem to be lacking too much information http://www.timberlakehistory.org/




The History section does go into a lot of detail about their history, portraying them as an important and old tribe with rich history and culture. The Sioux also talk about education and healthcare on their website but there is not much detail.

The American West and Native Americans in Paintings




Capturing the Grizzly was painted by Charles Marion Russell in 1901. Russell was known for his storytelling, both through his words and through his paintings, with this in mind, he often found himself sacrificing the accuracy of his paintings in favour of telling a better story. With this particular painting, we don’t know how historically accurate it is, but it can be seen as a romantic view of the American West.


It demonstrates the idea that man can tame the West, symbolised in the capturing of a large and dangerous wild animal. The action of capturing the bear indicates a strong sense of bravery on their part, this is emphasised by how the horses are clearly scared and attempting to flee (an instinctive response to the threat), but they follow the orders of their riders and stay reluctantly. The landscape is a strong backdrop to the barbaric treatment of the bear, it suggests there is a world out there that is drastically more significant than three men capturing a grizzly, yet they remain the focus, indicating that man sees himself at the forefront of any painting. 



The Holy Rattle (Elkwater Lake Battle, 1864) by Z.S. Liang was painted in 2015. The Battle of Elkwater Lake was between two Native American tribes, the Blackfoot and the Kootenay. It began by the Kootenay hunting buffalo on the Blackfoot territory without asking permission as they usually would have.

Without taking in the date of the painting into account, the first impression is that it was painted in order to portray the Native Americans as ‘uncivilised’ as their fighting appears to be chaotic and unorganised. This contrasts with how the settlers would have fought in organised groups. However when we take the date of the painting into account, in 2015 most people recognised the skill of the Native Americans and admired them for their strength, thus this painting suggests they were formidable opponents, even to each other. Their tribal wear suggests pride and loyalty, as well as a way to distinguish between allies and enemies. 

American Native + West images task



http://www.truewestmagazine.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/cowboys-bathing.jpg

This is an image of cowboys/frontiersmen taking a bath at what seems to be a creek after months of cattle driving. These cattle drives would often take months to complete and so the cowboys would bathe before heading into cowtown to celebrate.

This image is symbolic as it represents triumph and success in the new frontier in America. The men in the image are smiling after what can be assumed as a successful cattle drive. The image is relaxed at the lower half with men bathing although some men are horseback at the upper portion of the image. This creates a sense of haste. Although there are smiles, these men are still on schedule and there is an underlying sense of urgency.


This is an oil painting by Gregory Perillo. The image depicts a native horseback upon a mountainous prairie. The native man’s facial expression and body language here assumes an element of comfortability, majesty as well as the symbiotic relationship between man and animal. Most native tribes were not technologically progressive and preferred to live off the land and harness nature to the best of there ability. That being said, there is a cross over here which may indicate a time frame of when this painting is set, and that is the rifle. This suggests the painting may have been set in the mid to late 1800s as this is around the time where more modern firearms would’ve become more readily available to natives. What is also interesting about this image is an ulterior sense of paradox. Despite the native seeming majestic here, the way he is facing is interesting. In much frontier art we often see the progressive society (typically westerners) facing West, as this assumes they were always looking to the west (to signify westward expansion), so the fact that the native here is facing the east suggests and underlying regression and retreat, as if he is being pushed out of his Western homeland.

Thursday, 9 February 2017

Gender Roles in LHOTP

Gender Roles

Pa and Edwards
·      Pa is dominant male as he is the one who sells the house and calls the shots from chap 1 and decides to settle in chap 4
·      Chap 2 Pa in water with wagon
·      Chap 4 Pa scavenges while Ma does chores
·      All throughout Pa makes things
·      Pa plays fiddle. Skilled individual. Craftsman e.g chap 9 with chimney, roof and table.
·      Same with Edwards

Ma
·      Cooks and clean
·      Does house chores and trains the young to do more basic ones
·      More sensitive. Stereotypical traditional mother. Plays well to natural female emotions and uses these to her advantage in all aspects throughout the book.

Children
Children have no gender roles.
How does Ma parent?
How does Pa parent?
Chores in chap 10. Incentive for play


Community and coming together is usually initiated by men e.g Scotts, Edwards and to an extent, Natives e.g chap 5 he goes onto neighbor Edwards and natives in chap 18 where they eat silently together.

How do gender roles in this book fit with modern society?
Is this degrading?
Are the genders equal or is one seen as lesser?

Who works the hardest? Use all relevant examples without focusing too much on one part

Monday, 6 February 2017

Attitudes towards the Native Indians in Little House on the Prairie.

A variety of positive and negative attitudes are expressed throughout 'Little House on the Prairie' towards the Native Indians by the main characters, Pa, Ma, and Laura. Throughout the novel, Native Indians are seen as savages and unwanted within the more modern society that is being created by settlers heading West. The removal of Indians due to settlers cultivating the land leads to potential war and internal disagreements for both tribes and settlers.

In the eighteenth chapter, 'The Tall Indian' it is clear that Ma's views of Native Indians are extremely negative compared to Pa and Laura's judgement of them. By speaking on behalf of Jack, the dog, as to hating Indians and that she 'didn't blame him' suggests that she is forcing her opinion onto not only the other people around her such as her daughters but also on an animal who cannot talk for himself. Ma continues this outlook, declaring that Indians are 'so thick around here' when looking out across the fields and by seeing them, she expresses that she deems them uncivilised and unkempt compared to herself and her style of living. In addition to this, Ma's abrupt statement of 'Let Indians keep themselves to themselves and we will do the same.' reinforces that Ma does not agree with Native Indians being near her home and that they are and will not be a part of her society and lifestyle. Mrs Scott agrees with Ma when discussing the rights of land and whether the Wilders are in Indian Territory or not, saying that 'Treaties or no treaties, the land belongs to folks that'll farm it. That's only common sense and justice." Therefore, regardless of where settlers live, the Native Indians are deemed uncultured and useless to the settler's society and that they do not use the land in a sufficient way.  

So what or whom exactly has led to the pessimism that Ma expresses towards the Native Indians?

In Riley's 'Challenges of Plains Living', she analyses how many women settlers 'absorbed dramatic and often inflated stories' surrounding Native Indians during the move towards the West and that for many they [Native Indians] were to be feared due to their demeanour and brutal lifestyle. This is supported by the description of the Native Americans throughout Little House on the Prairie as they are written as if they are aliens or sub-human of some form due to repetitive description of their 'black eyes' and 'scowling and mean' features while appearing dirty compared to Laura's family. Therefore, it is possible that Ma's experiences of Native Indians have been negative since she first gained an understanding of them and their impact on her life due to listening to stories and conversations from others of their experiences with the Native Indians.

On the other hand, Pa's view significantly overshadows Ma's outlook on Native Indians as he influences Laura, his daughter's judgement and outlook towards the Native Indians. Pa views the Native Indians as peaceful and friendly in comparison to Ma. Pa continues even to defend them when Jack goes to attack the Native Indians and agrees that 'it's his path' as it was an Indian trail long before they themselves arrived. Pa expresses respect for the Natives and admires them to a certain extent as he engages with their lifestyle and living and does similar himself but with a settlers outlook on living standards. Pa prefers to live in the open where wild animals roam free and live unafraid of settlers similar to the lifestyle of Native Indians. Further on in the novel, Pa suggests that Ma could 'wash clothes in the creek' like the Indian women do but she refuses as she does not agree and is unaccustomed to this way of living. So did Pa experience earlier on in life a peaceful encounter with the Native Indians that leads to his approving attitude towards Native Indians?

Following on from this, Pa's view does change according to events that occur and believes that in contrast to Mr Scott's view of 'The only good Indian is a dead Indian' there are good Indians such as Soldat du Chene who prevents the local tribes from attacking them due to them settling near to one of their trails.  

In addition to Pa's attitude towards the Native Indians, Laura has made her judgement of the Indians quickly throughout the novel. Her desires of seeing an Indian throughout the novel, and her continuous questioning to Ma and Pa shows her deep interest in Indians. By understanding that these people were 'wild men with red skins' and not like herself she is keen to understand the differences between the two people. The frustration she shows when Ma disapproves of all her questions before bedtime about what happens to Indians when settlers arrives shows an underlining detachment between mother and daughter due to holding different interests. Why does Ma not wish to talk openly about Native Indians? What does Ma fear that Laura does not? For Laura, the Native Indians seem interesting and exciting and she struggles to understand why the government wish to move the further West when she is living near Indian Territory and they are not a threat to her. Laura even demands that Pa takes an Indian baby from the tribe and gives it to her but remains unsuccessful. Her wish to be an Indian is expressed in the novel but why does Laura wish to be a Native Indian? As Ma continuously disapproves Laura, she still seeks for an undefined answer about the Native Indians. 


Sources: Riley, G., Women's Responses to the Challenges of Plains Living, (1989), 175.
Wilder, L.I., Little House on the Prairie, (Harper, 1941), Ch 18.






Hardships faced by the Ingalls family

Hardships faced by the Ingalls family

The Ingalls family faced many hardships which were documented in little house on the prairie. From illness, to issues with the federal government, many obstacles were in the way of the Ingalls family’s American dream. Although the author of the novel, Laura Ingalls Wilder, was only a very small child at the time the book is set and she changed some facts to sell the book better, most of the events were either her own memories or memories and tales passed down by members of the family who were old enough to recount what happened in Kansas.

The start of the novel depicts the dangerous journey west across the frozen Mississippi and into the prairies of Kansas. On this journey, you begin to see the struggles the family will face throughout the book. The first major problem faced is the crossing of a creek, which does not seem to be much of a problem until their dog, Jack, is washed away and presumed to be dead. This highlights dangers to the family which may not have been obvious at first. It also shows that small actions could have major consequences, including the death of a family member.

When Jack, the dog, returns to the family it brings up another hardship faced by the Ingalls family which is a theme throughout the novel. The fact that Pa reaches for his gun, assuming the dog to be a dangerous animal such as a wolf or coyote proves that they are always in danger from the wildlife surrounding them. Further on in the book this issue is touched upon once more, when the family has to stay in the house and keep watch all night long after a pack of fifty wolves has surrounded them. Wolves in America were abundant at this time and historically their territory spanned nearly the whole country. Wolves were not the only wildlife that threatened the family though, Eastern Cougars (which are extinct as of 2011) were also a threat to safety. This was not just an issue for the white settlers though as shown in the novel when Pa goes out to kill the Cougar because it threatens the safety of the family and a native American man tells him through sign language that he has already killed it. This shows a link between the settlers and the Osage through threats to both their safety.
A major problem for families looking to settle in new lands was trying to find somewhere they could actually sustain themselves, with fresh water and sources and food for example. Pioneer America was a dangerous place, with harsh weather, deadly wildlife and little law enforcement. Cooperation with other settlers was necessary for survival in these conditions and luckily the Ingalls neighbours were helpful.

A large problem for the family was Native Americans. Their house was built in Osage territory and the family had several encounters with them. The first major encounter was when two Osage Indian men approached the house whilst Pa was off hunting, ate the family’s cornbread and took his tobacco. This event conveys a sense of vulnerability, making the family seem as though they are at the whim of the ‘Indians’.

The Ingalls unknowingly settled their house on Osage Land and towards the end of the novel there is a feeling of uneasiness towards the native Americans. This comes about when the Indians start using the trail past the house more and more, frequently stopping at the house for food and tobacco. Some in the community become suspicious when there is a raging prairie fire and put it down to the Native Americans who are gathering for a buffalo hunt nearby. Although pa dismisses this saying they are peaceful, you can see how tensions between settlers and the Osage could have reached breaking point. The general sense of discontent towards the Indians led to paranoia and the Ingalls were lucky that there was no violence on either side which could escalate. There is one point in the novel where several tribes have arrived near their house and are fighting nearby which leads to some of the Native Americans arguing that they should kill the settlers. This not only highlights the danger of living as the Ingalls did, but paints a brutal picture of the fates that some settlers and Native americans must have had. For this reason i feel like this is one of the most significant chapters which references the Hardships faced by settlers such as the Ingalls. The Native Americans were by far the most dangerous thing faced by the family in my opinion and this chapter perfectly encapsulates this through not only the paranoia the settlers had but also giving insight into the Native Americans opinions towards the settlers and the Ingalls. 

People of this time period, especially in Kansas, would not have had as good a grasp on medicine and what caused sickness as we do today. This is captured perfectly by the character Mrs Scott, who believed malaria was caused by eating “watermelon”. Because of little understanding of health issues at this time, sickness was also a major hardship for the family. Ma and Pa catch malaria, and are very ill. If either one of them had died from the illness the family may not have survived. This is especially true for Pa who was the main provider of food for the family.

Everyday there were circumstances which could have become deadly for the family. A good example of this is when the well is being dug by Pa and the family’s neighbour, Mr Scott. Mr Scott says that the well if fine to dig in, even though he hasn’t sent a candle down to check for poisonous gas. Because he hasn’t checked he does not realise that the well is actually full of gas and passes out at the bottom of it. Luckily, he is saved by Pa who was on hand at the time but this shows just how easily a small mistake or trying to cut corners in an environment like this could lead to tragedy. Another example of everyday danger is seen later on in the book when the chimney catches on fire. Had this fire become out of control then the house would have burned down and the family would most likely have died. Life on the prairie was hard and you had to be on constant alert to survive as one little mistake could mean the end for you and your family.

Towards the end of the book it becomes clear that the government is not happy with pioneers settling in Kansas at this point in time. Pa gets word across that the family will be evicted from the land when the army comes, so they decide to leave on their own terms rather than face the army. The government at this time was seen as a hindrance to many settlers who disagreed with the rolling out of the state and growth in federal power. Between the self-governing Osage Indians and the rising pressure from Washington, the Ingalls really had no say in whether or not they could stay in their homestead.  

Although it seems like life was terrible for the Ingalls Family in the novel, I believe that they would have been content with the lifestyle they led, it wasn’t just their family who faced hardships at this time, many settlers would have had worse experiences than they did. The sense of optimism is apparent in the book, demonstrated perfectly by the quote from the book “There's no great loss without some small gain.”. This kind of attitude is what pushed people to make it work for them out in the middle of nowhere.


Sunday, 5 February 2017

The Operation of Traditional Gender Roles

The traditional gender roles are not challenged a great deal in Little House on the Prairie. For the most part, there is a clear separation of duties. Pa deals with the physical and outside work, makes the decisions, and protects his family. Ma tends to the children, keeps the house in check and always has the supper ready for when Pa returns home from his hard day’s work. While these duties demonstrate the traditional duties of the men and women of the patriarchal society they came from, there are times within the text when it is seen that the women need to step-up and fulfil extra duties in order to be successful in the settling process. This is because there were often not many men around to be able to help in the physical tasks that were too much for one person, like building a house for example.

In Chapter five, The House on the Prairie, there is clear evidence that supports Glenda Riley’s statement in Women’s Responses to the Challenges of Plains Living, that “all Plainswomen… were expected to attend to, or help with, domestic duties.” In the opening paragraph of the chapter, Laura and Mary “hurried to help Ma wash the dishes,” even as small girls, they are expected to help Ma with the domestic tasks, another example of this elsewhere in the novel is when Ma asks Laura to lay the table. When they were washing the dishes, “Pa was loading everything else into the wagon and hitching up Pet and Patty,” this shows how Pa takes on the masculine duties of the father. He goes on to demonstrate the patriarchal nature of the pioneering family when he stops the wagon and announces “Right here we’ll build our house.” Ma doesn’t have a say in this, as Pa is in control of the decision making.

Showing his masculine abilities, Pa makes the house. He has the skill required and the knowledge of how to. This is a very traditional notion of self-sufficiency. However, he cannot do it alone and Ma has to help him. While this challenges the traditional gender roles of the time, it was not a successful challenge. A log fell, “Pa was trying to hold up his end of it, to keep it from falling on Ma. He couldn’t. It crashed down. Ma huddled on the ground.” This incident reveals that the woman cannot always take on the male roles. While she helped to some extent, she got hurt and showed that women are not physically capable of everything a man is, adhering to the traditional gender roles. He then goes on to blame himself as he is the man of the house, and responsible for protecting his family, which in this instance, he fails to do. Ma, despite being hurt, still has to fulfil her duties as a mother and wife, “she got supper as usual, only a little more slowly.” She soldiers on, ignoring the pain. Riley notes that “huge numbers of plucky women faced the challenges with creativity, energy, and optimism,” this can be seen when Ma claims “cheerfully” that she will get better soon enough, and seen by her continuing her duties.
The introduction of Mr. Edwards shows the reader that women need protection. This is clear when Pa says that “he can get along without a house better than you and the girls can.” There is no mention here of Pa being without a house, but of the women needing the security of the house, and in helping them first, Mr. Edwards sacrifices his own safety to provide it for the Ingalls women. His masculinity is praised when he is referred to as “a fast worker”.

Laura is an interesting character in terms of gender roles, as she doesn’t want to be ladylike as society dictates. “She wanted to hide and be still in the tall grass, like a little prairie chicken. But she didn’t. She helped Ma,” this tells the reader that Laura has a wildness in her that is not a traditional idea of how to be a woman. As a little girl, she is allowed to want to hide, but as a frontier woman she is expected to help out with the domestic duties no matter how she feels, as there are limited people to help. This is also demonstrated later on in the novel, when the entire family is ill, and she has to fetch water for Mary, despite being very sick herself, because Ma and Pa cannot do it themselves. Again, hinting at Laura’s desire for the outdoors, she “explored a little.” This contrasts with Mary, who is content to stay indoors in the domestic environment with Ma. Laura likes to be outdoors with Pa, examples of this include when she wants to go wading in the water, and when she wants to see the wolves. The reader gets a more vivid idea that Laura is not at all ladylike, when she “tried and tried, but she could never spit so far or so well as Mr. Edwards could.” This is a very masculine activity and as a girl she should never have even tried, and in doing so, she challenged the traditional gender roles of society.


In Riley’s article, she makes some interesting observations. In regards to the dangerous weather, “men feared these fires because they endangered the animals, crops, and buildings that were largely men’s responsibilities, but women often thought of their children and homes, and their cows, pigs, and chickens.” The reader sees Ma react to this danger by helping Pa to control and put out the Prairie fire later on in the novel, and in doing so she steps up and takes on a masculine role in order to protect her role as a mother. Riley also notes that “a common theme was the absence of other women and their longing for family members who had not migrated.” This must have been difficult for Ma, to initially only have the young children and Pa, who was often out hunting or doing another masculine activity. Despite the emotional difficulty, Ma was able to stay optimistic and cheerful, agreeing with Riley’s later point that “the majority of them [women] managed to maintain homes and families, carry out domestic functions, and perpetuate the many values associated with the home.”